Growing Alternative to Traditional Taxi Service †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Growing Alternative to Traditional Taxi Service. Answer: Introduction Uber-Company is an international transportation network organization located in San Francisco, United States (Cohen et al., 2016). Research shows that the organization is operating in more than five hundred cities across the world (Cramer and Krueger, 2016). The company has a variety of service ranging from Uberx: a model that allows an individual to use his or her car to collaborate with the organization, to Uber helicopter services that are rendered fast and economical when it comes to maneuvering congested cities (Cusumano, 2015). As such, for Uber to realize profits and ensure delivery of quality services to their consumers, the concept of governance has to be fully integrated within the institution. This calls for the analysis of the governance within the institution and implementation of different forms of governance. Governance is the process of an institution to formulate and implement policies for its benefits and that of the customers (Cohen et al., 2016). Therefore, the pu rpose of the paper I to illustrate the theoretical framework for the study of welfare policy implementation in Uber-Company. The article then makes use of works of several scholars who have attempted to offer coherence to governance and theories dominated by the bottom-up and top-down approach. Finally, the paper will provide a succinct summary of the discussed ideas as shown below. Understanding the concept of governance The object of research in the article is the concept of governance, and the assessment is centered on its utilization and theoretical manifestation in Uber. Recent studies indicate that several researchers such as De Vany, 2015; Dempsey, 2016 have a different opinion regarding governance hence the debatable topic is subject to explain its impact on the management of Uber. It is Gomez-Ibanez and Meyer, 2013 in his works who asserts that governance relates to the ability of an organization to adapt to its internal and external business environment. Internally, the framework constitutes but I not limited to staff members while market demands, consumers, and competitors characterize the external environment. Further, Hall and Krueger, 2016 is of the opinion that governance denotes a logical representation of coordinating social systems within a working place. In a business spectrum, governance can be described as good or bad. Good governance entails the implementation of policies that se ek to increase workers participation, fetch profits, and deliver quality services while providing incentives. On the other hand, bad governance alludes to internal factors that inhibit business growth. Such factors include but are not limited to the incompetency of the management to address worker's welfare. Notably, in-depth analysis of Uber's structural and business strategy indicates a program determined to ensure its progress. The program is characterized by factors such as governance, internal access controls, inquiries, transparency, and complaints. The elements are dependent on each other and through the human resource department; one can understand how the organization operates. Governance at Uber-Company The world today has realized development in all economic, political, social, and cultural spheres due to technological advancements. The same is experienced at Uber where since its establishment in the year 2007 by great minds such as Garret Camp and Travis Kalanick the company has been on the forefront to outshine its competitors through the delivery of quality of services (Wallsten, 2015). Later, in the year 2010, the company had launched an app that helped in communicating with customers and monitoring of the fleet of cars. Moreover, during its initial growth phase, the top management of the organization created a think tank made up of several experts who could fetch high markets aid most populated and developed cities of the world (Wallsten, 2015). Such experts include but are not limited to machinery experts, a nuclear physicist, and computational neuroscientist. Therefore, analyzing the forms of governance at Uber calls for an understanding of the organization plans towards tac kling loses; ensure coordination amid the large pool of drivers and customers, making of rules and regulations. The taxi rules and the regulatory model includes licensing by the management. The licenses provided to the drivers guarantees customer's safety when booking. Again, the regulation on fare prices acts as a strategy to woo customers to make Uber part of their daily lives. On the other hand, the regulatory services offered by the management act as barriers to promoting business growth. For instance, inflated prices might allow other taxi-based organizations to take advantages of the customers by offering low prices. Further, from the works of Rayle et al., 2014 it is evident that lack of competitors to outshine Uber makes the organization reluctant to adopt new business strategies to improve its service delivery. Another key thing to remember is that technological advancements have made it easy for governance amid several institutions. For instance, insight at Uber's business structure across the different countries has adopted the use of sophisticated rating systems as a taxi regulation model. The model advocates for safety approaches between the driver and the customer, and it allows for an algorithmic pricing. Notably, its ability to control market access beyond five hundred cities in the world allows the organization to act as a private licensing institution in the taxi industry. The regulatory approach used by Uber has several advantages that make the management offer good governance. First, through the implementation of pricing rating system, Uber can regulate market access by other taxi firms and harness any new technological ideas that emerge within the business sphere (Schwarz-Miller and Talley, 2013). As such, the organization can operate across different geographical zones and determine the pricing cost. Secondly, research indicates that with the establishment of an incumbent regime, there is a high chance of emergence of a rival policy to counter its existence. Therefore, when Uber policing is challenged there are high chances that the mode governance will be adjusted and so will the business structure: with an aim to maximize the social costs through a bargaining power. Therefore, from the discussion, it is evident that MSP technological advancements bring about good governance and they serve a regulatory role in the economic sphere (Imamura and Kohn o, 2016). Additionally, from the discussion it possible to discern that Uber has challenged the prevailing model of taxi governance: where taxis are owned by the organization, and the drivers are hired according to experience. The type of governance at Uber is a model that has seen the transition from the traditional governance of taxi to a modern approach where individuals with their cars can sign up with Uber and agree on a specific amount of cash to be paid per trip, monthly or annually. Consequently, the role of the state in ensuring algorithmic regulation on private industries such as Uber is a subject of debate. The main idea behind algorithmic regulation is to allow the government to manage big data and use the information on its citizens. The policies formulated by the different sectors of the government are assessed upon its impacts on the citizens and helps in determining the model of governance to suit service delivery. With such, the works of Rempel, 2014 is of significance value in explaining how the government of the different countries that Uber is operating on to harness the governance model and help integrate the private and public sectors as entities that boost the economic growth of a country. The trending news on different media stations has seen a heated debate on the issue of privatization of the transport system in San Francisco. Several stakeholders are of the opinion that Uber is paralyzing other taxi agencies and causing unemployment. However, from the works of Rogers, 2015, it is possible to argue that as much as the organization is a private entity the public and the state government is benefiting a lot from its practices. For instance, a report from the Savas and Savas, 2012 indicated that the increasing numbers of the fleets of Uber taxis see the state government collecting a reasonable amount of taxes that are responsible for the development of infrastructure not only in San Francisco but also across the different cities of operation across the world. Further, the works of Barro, 2014 indicate that through technological advancements the political interests develop. For instance, insight into the operations of Uber in San Francisco and New York City indicate that as much as the organization has brought about technological innovation on matters transportation, it has also introduced technological politi cs as a framework to establish its mode of governance within the cities. Conclusion Uber is a multinational company that has established its roots beyond the geographical boundaries of North America states. The availability of a committed and customer-oriented staff sees the organization ranked as the best taxi company in the world. From the discussion above, it is evident that the management of Uber has good governance: this alludes to the fact that it has been able to grow to a modern state of art organization within a period of ten years. Furthermore, the availability of human resource programs such as governance, transparency, and inquiries enables the company to address all its challenges to remain at the top of the competition. Additionally, having a large pool of market renders the organization a market regulatory agency. Also, its ability to use advanced technological pricing systems has enabled Uber to be the regulator of world market on matters taxi, delivery, and transportation: ranging from simple car taxi to helicopter services. Reference Barro, J. (2014). Under pressure from Uber, taxi medallion prices are plummeting. The New York Times. Cohen, P., Hahn, R., Hall, J., Levitt, S., Metcalfe, R. (2016). Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of uber (No. w22627). National Bureau of Economic Research. Cramer, J., Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. The American Economic Review, 106(5), 177-182. Cusumano, M. A. (2015). How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. Communications of the ACM, 58(1), 32-34. De Vany, A. S. (2015). Capacity utilization under alternative regulatory restraints: an analysis of taxi markets. Journal of Political Economy, 83(1), 83-94. Dempsey, P. S. (2016). Taxi industry regulation, deregulation, and reregulation: the paradox of market failure. Gomez-Ibaez, J., Meyer, J. (2013). Going private: The international experience with transport privatization. Brookings Institution Press. Hall, J. V., Krueger, A. B. (2016). An analysis of the labor market for Ubers driver-partners in the United States (No. w22843). National Bureau of Economic Research. Imamura, M., Kohno, T. (2012). U.S. Patent No. D420,995. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Rayle, L., Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Dai, D., Cervero, R. (2014). App-based, on-demand ride services: Comparing taxi and ridesourcing trips and user characteristics in san francisco university of california transportation center (uctc). University of California, Berkeley, United States Rogers, B.(2015) The social costs of Uber. James E. Beasley School of Law, Temple University, Philadelphia, United States. Rempel, J. (2014). A Review of Uber, the Growing Alternative to Traditional Taxi Service. Rogers, B. (2015). The social costs of Uber. U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue, 82, 85. Savas, E. S., Savas, E. S. (2012). Privatization and public-private partnerships (p. 4). New York: Chatham House. Schwarz-Miller, A., Talley, W. K. (2013). Effects of public transit policies on taxi drivers wages. Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 131-142. Wallsten, S. (2015). The competitive effects of the sharing economy: how is Uber changing taxis. Technology Policy Institute, 22.